On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Chris Gilbert wrote:
> > For testers :  I would really appreciate feedback on operating on
> > different memory configurations... esp. the Kinetic machines.
> 
> Ok will try ... nope it doesn't boot, I get:
> 
> I got 629 memory pages to mess with
> Getting memory configuration
> 
> Found DRAM (0) at 0x10000000 for	16384k
> Found DRAM (1) at 0x20400000 for	28672k
> Found DRAM (2) at 0x30000000 for	32768k
> Found VRAM (0) at 0x02000000 for	1024k
> 
> Address not recognised at line 6800

I managed to reproduce this error and fixed it... it was a memory boundary
issue ... It could be prevented with a bigger WimpSlot, so i `stole' one
page on the top that gave trouble and now it should work all OK :)) But
please test it ! :)) ... Its in the same directory in ftp://130.89.65.13
as version b.

> Does it require a patched kernel to actually boot at this point?   I'm using 
> a normal kernel (not had time to recompile, and your patches conflict with my 
> current working tree)

Nope, not till this stage ... it hasnt started loading the kernel even ...
that will happen later.

Hope this new `b' version will run on all Kinetic's now too ...

Cheers,
Reinoud