Subject: Re: Changing kernel base address (was: Re: Heads up: shared arm include files)
To: None <chris@paradox.demon.co.uk,port-arm32@netbsd.org>
From: Ben Harris <bjh21@netbsd.org>
List: port-arm32
Date: 01/30/2001 01:22:51
In article <01012922454405.00335@pinky.paradox.demon.co.uk> you write:
>On Thursday 25 January 2001  1:24 am, Mike Pumford wrote:
>> > How does this get pushed into current?  or should it be sent to tech-kern
>> > on the .s v .S thread?
>>
>> Submit a PR describing the bug along with the patches to fix it. Its also
>> worth a posting to tech-kern indicating that you have a patch to solve the
>> issue. IIRC the feeling on tech kern is that config should deal with .S and
>> .s files identically and that .S is the correct extension for cpp
>> preprocessed assembler.
>>
>> That way the PR should come to someones attention fairly quickly.
>
>Well I did a PR (12051), but I've not spotted a change go into config, and 
>the PR seems to have disappeared from the online query-pr interface as well.  
>Does this mean it's got lost or refused?  I've had no email on it.

For some reason it was marked as confidential, which means the Web interface
won't show it.  I couldn't see any reason for this, so I've put it back to
normal.  I would sort out applying and committing the patch, but I've just
noticed what time it is.

-- 
Ben Harris                                                   <bjh21@netbsd.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26               <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/arm26/>