Given the discussions on a common ELF format for arm26 and arm32
	code, might it make more sense to work towards a common 'arch/arm'
	and then separate arm26, riscpc, shark, cats, and others ports.

		David/absolute		-- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --


On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Matt Thomas wrote:

> At one point in time, it was discussed that the arm32 port
> should be split into 3 separate ports: dnard (shark), cats,
> and riscpc (acorn?).
>
> This would the common arm32 code and headers in arch/arm32
> but move the "port" specific to their respective directives.
>
> The reason I'm asking is another arm32 based will be coming
> to the repository soon and I'd like to do any split before
> I committing for it (or figure out how to glue it into arm32).
>
> For those that care, this will be a hpcarm32 port for arm32
> based handhelds like the Compaq iPaq.
> --
> Matt Thomas               Internet:   matt@3am-software.com
> 3am Software Foundry      WWW URL:    http://www.3am-software.com/bio/matt/
> Cupertino, CA             Disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message
>
>