Subject: Re: safety of kernels without DIAGNOSTIC
To: Chris Gilbert <chris@buzzbee.freeserve.co.uk>
From: David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org>
List: port-arm32
Date: 11/13/2000 09:30:19
	Generally if a test is cheap it should be under DIAGNOSTIC,
	if it affects performance it should be under DEBUG.

                David/absolute
			       -- www.netbsd.org: A pmap for every occasion --


On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Chris Gilbert wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Having been looking over some of the code in the arm32 dir I've noticed a few
> places (eg pmap_enter_pv has a loop that walks all the mappings)
>
> The main reason for asking is that if it is safe without wouldn't the default
> kernels be best done without DIAGNOSTIC?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>