Subject: Re: CATS/EBSA285 config (Was: Possible bug in arm32 strongarm optimisations)
To: Todd Vierling <tv@wasabisystems.com>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: port-arm32
Date: 10/27/2000 09:56:10
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 03:48:52PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, David Brownlee wrote:
>=20
> : 	Presumably -march=3Dstrongarm will work similarly to armv4, but
> : 	is less correct (armv4 includes FL_CO_PROC)?
> :=20
> : 	SHARK already had -march=3Dstrongarm, which should probably also
> : 	be switched.
>=20
> I believe the shark can handle halfword instructions properly...?
>=20
> That much aside, the Shark has no coprocessor.  It should be using
> softfloat, as well.

I'm pretty sure (but check the docs yourself) that no SA-110 _can_ have
any coprocessor (besides the internal system control coprocessor) because
it doesn't have an external coprocessor bus.

Don't know about SA-1100.

Regards,
	-is

--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBOfk1FjCn4om+4LhpAQF0+wf9HCGnBmt7if3mn9cUY1AU6MIPplTU1aBU
x2o56To9CE5WKEOvIBbYIhoyvWcHTlwyS21vuk8waov0NIt2/uRSP2Pj3wmkqLtK
x6dfW87pQvd3hQqjM8O2WdznsSF0aeJl+CC655jKivyHRt1wfxQomc3O0WuNI9zK
N5wLzTUNTI+bnH0z8Iia+zoRuzOwasl9iCc56fax61kBilrhFgJ4E1z4/+SezwXH
6JzfbBDLFjLj990OLfk75tLKRxV4taG4tDewuvRDql663MeYUEizRqMtppTSG1+Y
AzZbZkRjzkDtjw/Hx8Qs59NXyD2xCPsOsoEhYPMdx+OpzLm5XGEZ6A==
=SSsK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS--