"Charles M. Hannum" wrote:

> There still remains a serious bug related to cache flushing.  I don't
> know whether the bug is in the kernel or the CPU (though I suspect the
> latter, based on a comparison of the SA110 manual with the code), but
> it will certainly hose anything that expects to do cache
> synchronization.

You still think there's a big in the cache flush stuff? This worries me
:-) as I though it all worked. Can you drop me some hints?

How would you, or the project, feel about putting the hacks in for a few
months with ELF being the eventual goal?

	Neil

-- 
Neil A. Carson