On Sun, 16 Nov 1997, Markus Baeurle wrote:

> Hi Mark!
> 
> But linking doesn't succeed, especially csc.o references several
> functions called ncr53c9x_.... I really don't get this, the Cumana
> card has a FAS216 chip, so why does the object file reference
> ncr53c9x stuff???

Opps wrong csc.o There is a move to utilising the generic NCR53c9x driver
and I accidently sent you a version of csc.o that uses that.

> On the same subject, somebody should approach Cumana on behalf of the
> removal of the NDA. Who's going to do this? I can do it, but I want
> to coordinate this in case the kernel team want to do it themselves.
Well following some recent events we are hoping to make progress on this.

CHeers,
				Mark