Subject: Re: A suitable backup device
To: NetBSD ARM 32 mailinglist <port-arm32@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Peter Berg <Peter.Berg@ww.tu-freiberg.de>
List: port-arm32
Date: 11/08/1997 11:53:48
> On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, Neil A. Carson wrote:
>
> > An IDE ZIP would be good... SCSI performance is pretty dire on all cards
> > at the moment.
>
> Nah ! ZIP drives are very slow (I get about 100K/sec from an ATAPI one)
Not in general. I have a SCSI ZIP drive connected to my slow falcon and it
achieves about 1000KB/s (limited by the zip drive). The parallelport versions
should make up to 600Kb/s (regarding to an article which was printed in the
german GAG news) under RiscOS.
I can't imagine why the IDE versions should not bring the same performance, at
least as the parallelport version.
> and are not a high enough capacity.
Thats an argument ;)
Ciao, Peter.