Subject: Re: Struggling with RiscBSD: Update
To: Ale Terlevich <A.I.Terlevich@durham.ac.uk>
From: Scott Stevens <s.k.stevens@ic.ac.uk>
List: port-arm32
Date: 09/17/1997 10:29:18
Ale Terlevich writes:
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Sep 1997, Scott Ashcroft wrote:
>
> >
> > Learning to program the bourne shell is important though as its best
> > for scripts (you know it will always be there). Don't even think about
> > csh scripting.
> >
>
> I do keep hearing this, and as a non computer scientist (I just (ab)use
> UNIX systems all day long) noone's ever told me why!
>
> So I'm asking you all now, What's wrong with (t)csh scripting?
>
> I mostly use perl for anything complex anyway. Nothing wrong with that is
> there? :)
There's nothing wrong with csh scripting but from a portability
perspective sh(1) tends to be the one to use. Not all systems have
tcsh/perl installed. Although csh is usually available...
> Ta,
> Ale.
Cheers Scott
--
Scott Stevens, Network Services Group, Computer Centre, Imperial College
"Ah, we certainly know what goes into good beer in Ankh-Morpork," he
said. The wizards nodded. They certainly did. That's why they were
drinking gin and tonic. - Soul Music, Terry Pratchett