On Fri 20 Jun, Chris Gilbert wrote:
> Today (Fri 20 June) Kjetil Thomassen wrote:
>> On Wed 18 Jun, Chris Gilbert wrote:
> 
>> But, I am not sure that this is a topic for this list. There has been
>> mentioned the setting up of a different mailing list that will
>> cover this topic in the near future.
> 
> Ack I've not had time to read current in the past few days.  My 
> reason for posting to here was more to see what the effect would be 
> on the arm32 port, not if the licence should be as it is.  Another 
> reason being some people possibly don't read current-users and may 
> not have heard about it.  The discussion on the licence, I agree, 
> shouldn't be here, the effects for the arm32 port should though.

I am sorry if I didn't make myself clear.

What I meant was that the license itself should not be discussed
on this list.

I agree that effects on the ARM32 port should be discussed here.

At present I do not think we need to worry too much, but we don't
know what will happen.

Kjetil B.