Subject: Re: *very* slow C++-compiler
To: None <jscharrl@BA-Stuttgart.De>
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <agulbra@troll.no>
List: port-arm32
Date: 05/05/1997 19:55:14
Jochen Scharrlach <jscharrl@BA-Stuttgart.De>
> compiling the tools-directory may take a bit - I have compiled a file
> of the kernel lib, maybe this is enough (the compiler working on the
> "tools" ATM :))

This one looks quite reasonable.  Took about a minute and a half from
start to finish, right?  What I'd like to see is the output of -v -Q
when the compile goes wrong.  Perhaps we're pushing gcc a little too
hard somewhere.  We shouldn't - after all, 14 different compiler all
eat that code.  But each new platform tends to need new workarounds.

The file you picked is perfect for the purpose - if the make goes
wrong.

(I don't know whether it is polite to send this sort of debugging
output to port-arm32.  Is it?)

--Arnt