Subject: Re: Probs with ffs_update
To: Boris Boesler <s_boesle@ira.uka.de>
From: David Croft <david@infotrek.demon.co.uk>
List: port-arm32
Date: 11/11/1996 19:46:08
On Mon, 11 Nov 1996, Boris Boesler wrote:

> It happend again:
> 
> ffs_update: bad indirect add(1): inode=98124 4194304/00400000
> ip=f14dd500 adr=f14dd5b0
> 
> inode vp: type VBLK, usecount 664, writecnt 0, refcount 27.
> tag VT_UFS: no 98 on dev 24 , 0
> ffs_update: bad indirect addr patched inode=98124

I get these constantly, and there seems to be no permanent damage. In
fact, the FAQ mentions it and says not to worry (IIRC).

-- 
David Croft                     mailto:david@infotrek.demon.co.uk
Infotrek Software Developments    http://www.infotrek.demon.co.uk/