>  As to StrongARM.
>
>Will we require a new bootloader as well as a new kernel?

Yep The 1.2-release bootloader will be SA compatible.
Only a couple of minor changes..

>I tried (just for the hell of it) booting the latest kernel with my SA
>fitted, and as soon as I pressed boot, it gave an error (abort on
>somethingorother) but !BtRiscBSD didn't die, and RiscOS stayed working
>fine. Presumably this is happening in the early stages of loading the
>kernel, before it even starts running it?  (This is using the latest
>bootloader from the 1.2-beta directory)
>
>  Just wondering!
Use of swi like OS_SynchroniseCodeAreas are needed in the bootloader ...
You would get further if you do *cache off first ;-)

CHeers,
				Mark

-- 
Mark Brinicombe				amb@physig.ph.kcl.ac.uk
Research Associate			http://www.ph.kcl.ac.uk/~amb/
Department of Physics			tel: 0171 873 2894
King's College London			fax: 0171 873 2716