I am cheating and mailing to the list what I was trying to mail to
Mark, but I can't get through! The last bit is general anyway.

  Patrick

Re.:
> From  Sun Jul 07 13:09:20 1996
> Delivery-date: Sun, 7 Jul 1996 13:09:20 +0100
> Date: Sun, 7 Jul 1996 13:01:21 +0100
> From: MAILER-DAEMON@physig4.ph.kcl.ac.uk (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
> Subject: Returned mail: unknown mailer error 8
> Message-Id: <199607071201.NAA05845@physig4.ph.kcl.ac.uk>
> To: <prlw1@cus.cam.ac.uk>
> 
> The original message was received at Sun, 7 Jul 1996 13:01:21 +0100
> from taurus.cus.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.48]
> 
>    ----- The following addresses had delivery problems -----
> <amb@physig4.ph.kcl.ac.uk>  (unrecoverable error)
> 
>    ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> mail: Can't send to amb
> 554 <amb@physig4.ph.kcl.ac.uk>... unknown mailer error 8
> 
>    ----- Original message follows -----
> Received: from taurus.cus.cam.ac.uk by physig4.ph.kcl.ac.uk via SMTP (950413.SGI.8.6.12/930416.SGI.AUTO)
> 	for <amb@physig4.ph.kcl.ac.uk> id NAA05844; Sun, 7 Jul 1996 13:01:21 +0100
> Return-Path: <prlw1@cus.cam.ac.uk>
> Received: from prlw1 by taurus.cus.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 0.53 #6)
> 	id E0ucseI-0006Zf-00; Sun, 7 Jul 1996 13:09:14 +0100
> Subject: erratum
> To: amb@physig4.ph.kcl.ac.uk (Mark Brinicombe)
> Date: Sun, 7 Jul 1996 13:09:14 +0100 (BST)
> From: prlw1@cus.cam.ac.uk (Patrick Welche)
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Length: 670       
> Message-Id: <E0ucseI-0006Zf-00@taurus.cus.cam.ac.uk>
> 
> Hello Mark,
> 
> For eigen.s / eigen.i I should have written thbphon.s / thbphon.i,
> also thinking about it, it will not be possible to link the the 3 .s
> files involved in that problem (thbphon.s thbtime.s and time.s) as
> thbtime.s has etime_(float *), whereas time.s has etime(float *), but
> still the odd compiler error should be apparent in the assembling of
> the thbphon.s code.
> 
> I was also wondering what was happening on the following fronts:
> - StrongARM
> - Hydra
> - pic
> - threads
> and what the state of 1.2 is. Is it that netbsd.org are not releasing
> updates to 1.2, so we wait until they do, and then recompile
> everything? (I'd be happy to help)
> 
>   Best wishes,
> 
>   Patrick