Port-arm archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: odroid-c1's awge0 on 9?

To: Christoph Badura <bad%bsd.de@localhost>
Subject: Re: odroid-c1's awge0 on 9?
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 12:55:16 -0700

> On Nov 2, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Christoph Badura <bad%bsd.de@localhost> wrote:
> 
> Or maybe fix rgephy and back out the workarounds.  Jarend pointed out that
> phy address 0 is a broadcast address on RTL8211[EF].

How is using the DT information to find the PHY a "workaround"?  It certainly seems like it would in fact be preferred.

-- thorpej

Follow-Ups:
- Re: odroid-c1's awge0 on 9?
  - From: Christoph Badura

References:
- odroid-c1's awge0 on 9?
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: odroid-c1's awge0 on 9?
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: odroid-c1's awge0 on 9?
  - From: Christoph Badura
- Re: odroid-c1's awge0 on 9?
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: odroid-c1's awge0 on 9?
  - From: Christoph Badura

Prev by Date: Re: odroid-c1's awge0 on 9?
Next by Date: 2019-11-09-netbsd-raspi-earmv6hf.img (Re: Raspberry Pi update please.)
Previous by Thread: Re: odroid-c1's awge0 on 9?
Next by Thread: Re: odroid-c1's awge0 on 9?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index