Port-arm archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]


coypu%sdf.org@localhost wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:40:45PM +0000, Robert Swindells wrote:
>> coypu%sdf.org@localhost wrote:
>> >COMPAT_NETBSD32 however means something else for 32bit (oarm), we
>> >probably don't want it (it does work, btw).
>> We may want COMPAT_NETBSD32 on 64bit to mean the capability to run
>> earm 32bit binaries.
>> Personally, I build aarch64 distributions with MKCOMPAT=no.
>It does mean that..

There are likely to be things that don't work yet on aarch64, I would
leave the kernel option on for now.

MKCOMPAT=yes for aarch64 builds aarch64, earm and oarm though, I don't
think we need all of them.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index