Port-arm archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Regarding "fast" path for IRQ handling out of the idle loop

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:21:43AM +0530, Ramakrishna Rao Desetti wrote:
> It appears, in that case, the soft interrupt would not be processed as part of
> irq_idle_entry processing. This is in contrast to irq_entry(), which processes
> any pending soft interrupts towards the end of its processing. Hence it appears
> irq_idle_entry may unnecessarily delay processing of soft interrupts.

If you look at the next commit to arm32/irq_dispatch.S, you'll see this had
been fixed within ~1 hour :-)


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index