Port-arm archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Retransmission: Minor issue w/ syslog ....
In article <5568CE47.1080208%hiwaay.net@localhost>,
William A. Mahaffey III <wam%hiwaay.net@localhost> wrote:
>
>
>.... I have a RPiB+ serving as the time server on my LAN. I followed the
>excellent instructions @
>http://rich-tbp.blogspot.com/2013/03/netbsd-on-rpi-minimizing-disk-writes.html
>(posted on this list a few weeks ago) to try to minimize unnecessary
>disk I/O to prolong the life of the micro SD 'HDD' that the box uses. I
>redirected syslog I/O to another box on the LAN, however I am still
>getting some stuff on the RPi syslog file:
>
>
>May 10 17:06:15 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 11 09:07:17 rpi timed[6547]: measure: kabini1.local did not respond
>May 11 09:07:17 rpi timed[6547]: measure: kabini1.local did not respond
>May 11 09:31:25 rpi timed[6547]: no reply to time correction from
>kabini1.local
>May 11 09:47:19 rpi timed[6547]: measure: kabini1.local did not respond
>May 11 09:47:19 rpi timed[6547]: measure: kabini1.local did not respond
>May 11 09:51:19 rpi timed[6547]: measure: kabini1.local did not respond
>May 11 09:51:19 rpi timed[6547]: measure: kabini1.local did not respond
>May 11 15:07:05 rpi su: wam to root on /dev/pts/0
>May 11 15:14:17 rpi sshd[24420]: error: PAM: authentication error for
>root from q6600
>May 11 10:20:42 rpi syslogd[11087]: last message repeated 2 times
>May 11 15:17:41 rpi su: wam to root on /dev/pts/2
>May 11 17:06:16 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 12 17:06:15 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 13 17:06:15 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 14 11:06:16 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 14 17:06:15 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 15 17:06:16 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 16 17:06:16 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 16 23:40:44 rpi su: wam to root on /dev/pts/0
>May 17 17:06:16 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 18 16:09:50 rpi su: wam to root on /dev/pts/1
>May 18 13:06:16 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 18 17:06:16 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 19 17:06:15 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 20 17:06:15 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 21 04:16:09 rpi su: wam to root on /dev/pts/0
>May 21 04:18:27 rpi su: wam to root on /dev/pts/1
>May 21 17:06:16 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 22 16:06:15 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 22 17:06:15 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 23 17:06:15 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 24 17:06:15 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 25 17:06:15 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 26 17:06:16 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>May 26 18:06:15 rpi syslogd[11087]: restart
>Wed May 27 15:43:10 MCDT 2015
>
>In particular, the syslogd-restart messages don't show up on the other
>box (the rest does). My syslog.conf follows:
>
>
>rpi # cat syslog.conf
># $NetBSD: syslog.conf,v 1.9 2004/07/23 03:45:42 mycroft Exp $
>
>*.err;kern.*;auth.notice;authpriv.none;mail.crit /dev/console
>
>*.err;kern.*;auth.notice;authpriv.none;mail.crit /var/log/messages
>
>*.err;kern.*;auth.notice;authpriv.none;mail.crit @kabini1
>
>*.info;auth,authpriv,cron,ftp,kern,lpr,mail.none /var/log/messages
>kern.debug /var/log/messages
>
>*.info;auth,authpriv,cron,ftp,kern,lpr,mail.none @kabini1
>kern.debug @kabini1
>
># The authpriv log file should be restricted access; these
># messages shouldn't go to terminals or publically-readable
># files.
>auth,authpriv.info /var/log/authlog
>
>cron.info /var/log/cron
>ftp.info /var/log/xferlog
>lpr.info /var/log/lpd-errs
>mail.info /var/log/maillog
>#uucp.info /var/spool/uucp/ERRORS
>
>*.emerg *
>
>*.emerg @kabini1
>
>#*.notice root
>rpi # uname -a
>NetBSD rpi 7.0_BETA NetBSD 7.0_BETA (RPI.201503272230Z) evbarm
>rpi #
>
>Basically, I duplicated all lines that I found going to messages & sent
>them to kabini1, the other box. However, the syslogd-restart messages
>don't make it over there. Could be pilot error, but I would like to
>eventually comment out *ALL* of the lines writing to my messages file,
>w/o missing any messages, no matter how trivial (such as syslogd
>restarting). Any clues appreciated. TIA & have a good one.
>
>
>C'mon, throw me a bone ;-) ....
From my reading of the code it is possible that none of the messages
created inside the init() function are propagated.
christos
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index