Re: thumb2

[Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>]

On May 29, 2014, at 10:11 AM, Justin Cormack 
<justin%specialbusservice.com@localhost> wrote:

> Has anyone looked at doing a 100% thumb2 build? It looks like some of
> the assembly (memcpy etc) would need some tweaking for the small
> number of unsupported functions but it should not be a huge amount of
> work.

I have.  I run a kernel compiled as thumb but it didn't survive long.
ddb got very confused :)

userland is in better shape.  for memcpy/etc i'd just make then ARM_ENTRY
instead of entry and not worry about it.