Subject: Re: common irq handler code
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Toru Nishimura <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/10/2007 20:37:28
Steve Woodford comments;
> on ARM, a PC-relative load just to find
> the address of the variable. This is all inlined code, so even small
> functions like this contrived example:
[ ... inline designation ends up with larger number of insns ... ]
I've been concerned that recent trend of excessive use of inline code
by *.h. It does not necessarily contribute the code compactness, the
ease of maintenance, future growth and HW adaptation. I would
toss the vote for "do-not-make-spl-inline" discipline since "it's _the_
place of possible improvements by funcy tricks and insns."
> Using the above two suggestions in tandem, the spl(9) implementation will
> be much smaller, the code will scale to multiple hardware masks much
> more easily, and you may find some more opportunities to factor out
> common/shared code.
That's what I expect common/re-targetable example for future growth.
Toru Nishimura/ALKYL Technology