Subject: Re: OMAP _almost_ builds at tip of tree now.
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Bucky Katz <email@example.com>
Date: 02/21/2007 09:30:10
"Toru Nishimura" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Quite frankly, I'm doubtful whether ep93xx/ep93xx_intr.c is doing
> spl(9) correctly. dual VIC design is a mud pool.
Yes. The guys who did our OMAP interrupt code had a lot of problems
getting it right.
> I guess some of readers are to port NetBSD/arm for new ARM SoC.
> Implementing NetBSD interrupt machinery for ARM is the hardest part
> of the entire efforts.
Yes. It did cost us much effort.