Subject: Re: OMAP patch 1/5: OMAP 1 base support
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/01/2006 15:56:28
In article <email@example.com>, Bucky Katz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>email@example.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
>> In article <451C6132.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
>> Todd Allan <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>Attached is a patch to add generic base support for systems based on the
>>>OMAP 1 family. The devices supported in this patch are serial console
>>>and MPU timers for OS timing purposes.
>>>This patch depends upon patches previously sent by Scott Allan: "Three
>>>small patches for ARM" on 07/26/2006 and "Patch to add support for
>>>ARM9E" on 07/31/2006.
>>>A staggering number of mobile phones, PDAs, and other portable devices
>>>are based on these systems, and OMAP would make a great addition to
>>>NetBSD. If there are any concerns we can address or other things we can
>>>do to get this code accepted upstream please let me know, thanks,
>> Can you please send-pr these so that they don't get lost?
>Done. PR#s are kern/34679, kern/34680, kern/34682, kern/34683, and
>kern/34684 because I had a brane fade and submitted them against kern
>instead of port-arm.