Subject: Re: issues with KGDB and ARM
To: Karl Janmar <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Hiroyuki Bessho <email@example.com>
Date: 03/30/2005 16:11:43
At Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:25:44 +0200,
Karl Janmar wrote:
> I have double checked now, I don't have DDB defined, and I think I can
> trace the whole path to where
> KERNEL_BREAKPOINT is incorrectly written.
> sys/kern/kgdb_stub.c:kgdb_trap() ---->
> sys/ddb/db_run.c:db_set_single_step() ---->
> hmm... I don't see where the DDB define matter anyway, since the
> BKPT_SET() macro is always using KERNEL_BREAKPOINT that is define
> without any ifdefs that changed depending on debugging method?
Mmm, I misunderstood the code. You are right and
db_set_single_step() is not #ifdef-ed out by DDB.
IIRC, gdb sets break point by itself using read/write command
through stub, so kernel doesn't need to put GDB breakpoints
(db_set_single_step is not called in KGDB). At least, it was the way
it worked when I used KGDB last time. It seems gdb is using step
command and the kernel is required to put GDB breakpoint by itself in
Karl's case. GDB or stub have changed or Karl is using different
version of GDB?
I'll try kgdb on an eval board tonight.