Subject: Re: siginfo changes Q
To: None <>
From: Christos Zoulas <>
List: port-arm
Date: 10/18/2003 17:49:17
In article <>,
Christos Zoulas <> wrote:

Err s/m68k/arm/ but m68k is broken the same way.

>The problem is that m68k does not defined SIGTRAMP_VALID, and still
>has the old code get_have_sigreturn() stuff.
>    sys/arch/m68k/include/signal.h
>    lib/libc/arch/m68k/sys/__sigaction14_sigtramp.c 
>need to be updated so that the code works like in the x86 case.