Subject: Re: siginfo changes Q
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/18/2003 17:49:17
In article <HMys1o.email@example.com>,
Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Err s/m68k/arm/ but m68k is broken the same way.
>The problem is that m68k does not defined SIGTRAMP_VALID, and still
>has the old code get_have_sigreturn() stuff.
>need to be updated so that the code works like in the x86 case.