Subject: Re: 1.6.1 lack of stability on cats
To: Chris Gilbert <chris@dokein.co.uk>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <is@netbsd.org>
List: port-arm
Date: 02/09/2003 21:33:23
--ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

> On Sun, 09 Feb 2003 18:33:58 +0000
> Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@buzzard.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > I've just built a 1.6.1_RC1 kernel with strongarm optimizations
> > enabled, but with bcopyinout.S pulled up to revision 1.6 and the
> > kernel seems fine (sufficient to completely bootstrap and regtest gcc
> > without any untoward problems).
>=20

but on Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:43:25PM +0000, Chris Gilbert wrote:
> Hmmm, just wondering why, certainly it sounds like we should get it
> pulled up ASAP.  I'll put a pullup request in. =20

=2E.. which requests the latest version of that file, which is 1.9.
However, Richard tested version 1.6 in the netbsd-1-6 context.=20

Shouldn't the pullup request be for 1.6?

Regards,
	Ignatios
--=20
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/

--ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE+RrsSPCRcZ/VMtk4RAsZWAJ4xM37BNlB6iqyb2xqRJcsTbfXVEgCglkCB
XmdO99iqlXSGEjU+gxJPTOY=
=YfvF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM--