Subject: Re: 1.6.1 lack of stability on cats
To: Chris Gilbert <chris@dokein.co.uk>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: port-arm
Date: 02/03/2003 11:46:50
--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:39:21AM +0000, Chris Gilbert wrote:

> COPTS=3D"-O2 -march=3Darmv4 -mtune=3Dstrongarm"
>=20
> Is this a likely cause, and if so, should we be considering disabling
> the optimisations for 1.6.1?
>=20
> Does anyone else running an arm box with 1.6.1 have stability issues?

I have a PR open about this. It's not clear whether the compiler is the
culprit or just an innocent messenger, but I made my Shark much more stable
by running an kernel without the -march=3D and mtune=3D parts.

Regards,
	Ignatios

--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBPj5IlzCn4om+4LhpAQHHJQf9GrgFoRSG2iKCyXoruOU9Fxr6U59imAOB
s+eVYp5gK3dihpHJ8cWwD/brVeQCc2KhyF0u2YUQySsma7/ABGKccgboUUOwrGsg
4/Jmvq5Aq7fAyV3y73j4X31hVY6usuKvrEbBHmjXvs0TxFQ06LANj7TrQNe9xq19
O9eVzsUs11BhUgmRlTDQ3plwWIcOdKYpM7d/pP8o68qg2j6YkCfhr+QcUmPlC2aB
VQWKY+yL2ZHtzdsPW6SJ3U1mRyJIabZZd0wA+ytvq/AwkFIT7tsuxxQUx2ig+mlk
XW4mOPFfJqip+lhSzaDUWx6HBQ6ghv72ho++vDgioZR6I0Cy5YRibw==
=tIk2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV--