Subject: Re: Shouldn't we compile kernels at least without StrongARM
To: Ignatios Souvatzis <>
From: Richard Earnshaw <>
List: port-arm
Date: 01/24/2003 13:18:55
> Hi,
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 11:28:19AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > I'm pretty certain that there is at 
> > least one bug somewhere in the compiler, which is revealed every time you 
> > try to run Xemacs, but since it doesn't cause a crash, and since debugging 
> > X libraries is so hard (and I've no idea where in the towering edifice the 
> > problem lies) I haven't been able to track that one down.
> Look at my PR 19276. No X involved.

There's no real reason to think these are related.  Additionally, I build 
tetex on my shark running current recently and didn't see this problem.

Any chance you can track this down a bit further?