Subject: Re: Data format compatibility: old NetBSD/arm32, NetBSD/arm 26 vs. 32 bit
To: None <port-arm@netbsd.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: port-arm
Date: 10/29/2002 15:10:32
--V4b9U9vrdWczvw78
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 02:01:22PM +0000, Ben Harris wrote:
> > I noticed we use the same binaries on acorn26 and the 32bit cpus - is t=
hat
> > right?
>=20
> Yes.  It turns out that if you ask GCC to generate code to run in 32-bit
> modes, the result works in 26-bit modes as well.  There used to be a
> problem with __builtin_return_address(), but Richard fixed that.

Ah, fine. NETBSDARM, then.

Regards,
	-is

--V4b9U9vrdWczvw78
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBPb6W1TCn4om+4LhpAQH/dgf/TwRyOtam4qp7liKk5jOflC20vap2jgcX
mUKuRua3EFH4AePYvmxcQ6u753fj9tFdw0qnzJkIdsIwDe2O7FACit9ftPQBM8Df
uXmXiGE3BkASuPGt00m3HequKXezfmskiNY+T9eZJwN08Z8jl2w/fEFxm5X5hZr4
F9oGXrY28MCzJaaQuY5iXK457a7y/MY4ubxmRDdcKMHD+UJCglFHXI4qkzJrlAKL
Zx4VR5s/qlqzs78gERl6l+1WiRL8O/sWHwE3FeboYiAXYbbBxObq+cje+I4dutSU
l8QRIyTpgVUbrN92H9nD7G8wsimtzcUxKz21yqwKYdO9iFZvfNL/HA==
=Pjiw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--V4b9U9vrdWczvw78--