Subject: Re: Data format compatibility: old NetBSD/arm32, NetBSD/arm 26 vs. 32 bit
To: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: port-arm
Date: 10/29/2002 14:55:38
--xA/XKXTdy9G3iaIz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

I wrote:

> I want to decide whether it will NETBSDARM32 on all of them, or whether
> I need to create NETBSDARM26 and NETBSDARM in addition.
>=20
> Structure alignment counts - PVM[1] uses the the PVM_ARCH value to decide
> whether a non-encoded transfer is possible.

actually, it's easier than that. PVM_ARCH is also used to decide where
to load a remotely started binary from, so the answer is "yes".=20

I noticed we use the same binaries on acorn26 and the 32bit cpus - is that=
=20
right?


	-is

--xA/XKXTdy9G3iaIz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBPb6TVTCn4om+4LhpAQHX3wgAhgqAP6AuezkwHQRArZlQGoXROtNbTvIG
dToegFBo2KAd7qDu9lzLSDqqdg/b7plhrBIRnk55QAJrs6Ee9cQr0NGz748WRHdc
IEfFFFOxdtXWFV74DmmTn5U5WM6ro9JiDK6sj1vNFRfSwuP3qiZ1kXtsdktgyeK6
OQBP1Em1Q34GLbGO1+wZ9+1tz6DjLu4U3hoW1W03MJgqpEE7gOLE3ozWhfERLNnM
XNUTVpjUvDAZ+/BSqqp6IsU8DvpryYcjBEzEbVqBE4BdobYgRU7xpgdXR25EpwNu
tVBenbL6SwMyb1ZSh5KfGQhHi3AQi4Cl/yNK4k81oI8Sd4NdoX6p2g==
=iur2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xA/XKXTdy9G3iaIz--