Subject: Re: RETURN_IN_MEMORY
To: Jason R Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Chris Gilbert <email@example.com>
Date: 08/28/2002 19:42:19
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:30:24 -0700
Jason R Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:27:28AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > Agree, but write the test out explicitly as a check for <0 and a check for
> > > UNITS_PER_WORD -- if you put int_size_in_bytes into a temporary gcc
> > should do the above optimization for you.
> Ok, here is the patch I'm checking in to our 2.95.3-based compiler. Watch
> gcc-patches for the version for 3.3 (I already have two pending review :-)
One question, is this going to change/break any ABI's? I suspect not, but just a thought, and wanted to be sure.