Subject: Re: ARM ELF TODO list
To: Todd Vierling <email@example.com>
From: Ben Harris <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/04/2002 18:57:23
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Todd Vierling wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Ben Harris wrote:
> : * back-compat a.out ld.so binary
> Add to this a kernel COMPAT_AOUTARM option, given that the ABI has changed.
> (If struct alignment hasn't changed, this may not be an issue. It was an
> issue on m68k....)
Struct alignment hasn't changed (ARM changed theirs to match ours, as far
as we can tell). I think the only possibly-relevant change is that enums
might end up different sizes, but I suspect there are no enums passed
across the user/kernel boundary anyway.
> : * sysinst support for transition
> See my post of 31/Dec. If you follow the standard NetBSD layout for
> separate $MACHINEs, simply create the right sysinst and MAKEDEV for the
> right $MACHINE and everything works -- no multiple kernels, no multiple boot
So sysinst will already notice a.out libraries and shift them to
/emul/aout when upgrading, or whatever the right thing is?
Ben Harris <email@example.com>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26 <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/arm26/>