Subject: Re: New ARM port to the Integrator development board
To: None <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
From: Robert Swindells <email@example.com>
Date: 10/22/2001 11:40:39
>> At 05:58 PM 10/20/2001 +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> >Unless anyone has any specific objections to the name, I propose to commit
>> >the code under the port name "integrator" over the next few days.
>> If this is an evaluation board, it should go under evbarm/integrator.
>Strictly speaking its a development board, but who's counting?
>I'll see if I can merge the two together.
I thought that the plan was to go for more ports instead of trying to
merge the code for unrelated systems.