>> At 05:58 PM 10/20/2001 +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> 
>> >Unless anyone has any specific objections to the name, I propose to commit
>> >the code under the port name "integrator" over the next few days.
>> 
>> If this is an evaluation board, it should go under evbarm/integrator.

>Strictly speaking its a development board, but who's counting?

>I'll see if I can merge the two together.

I thought that the plan was to go for more ports instead of trying to
merge the code for unrelated systems.

Robert Swindells