Subject: Re: Shared library support for ARM ELF
To: Matt Thomas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Ben Harris <email@example.com>
Date: 07/23/2001 10:47:56
On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Matt Thomas wrote:
> Even better would be to get them shared completely. But since they
> are drastically different, that might be difficult. arm26 seems to
> use its own version of fp_state_t called fpframe. arm32 uses
That shouldn't be a problem. The arm26 version was basically a
placeholder until I got round to doing proper FPA support, which I haven't
> Both have different switch frames.
This might be slightly trickier, but there's no good reason why they need
to be different, I don't think. It's just likely to need cpu_loswitch(),
or its equivalent on arm32, to be modified to use a common structure.
Come to that, the code should really be shared, but that's likely to be
rather more hassle.
Ben Harris <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26 <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/arm26/>