Subject: Re: The spagetti that is arm32/machdep.c
To: None <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
From: Ben Harris <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/07/2001 17:29:31
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> In this case, I think we should move all the consinit code out of this
> file and into one of its own (controlled by files.* adding the file as
> required for a configuration). I think this would entirely eliminate the
> dependency of this file on FOOTBRIDGE, SHARK or vidc.
That sounds like a tolerable idea, though perhaps said file should
actually be port-specific (I've not looked at the code).
> Any comments before I get out the scissors?
Go for it.
Ben Harris <email@example.com>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26 <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/arm26/>