On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Richard Earnshaw wrote:

> In this case, I think we should move all the consinit code out of this
> file and into one of its own (controlled by files.* adding the file as
> required for a configuration).  I think this would entirely eliminate the
> dependency of this file on FOOTBRIDGE, SHARK or vidc.

That sounds like a tolerable idea, though perhaps said file should
actually be port-specific (I've not looked at the code).

> Any comments before I get out the scissors?

Go for it.

-- 
Ben Harris                                                   <bjh21@netbsd.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26               <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/arm26/>