Subject: Re: cpufunc.h
To: John Fremlin <>
From: Ben Harris <>
List: port-arm
Date: 06/01/2001 12:24:07
On 1 Jun 2001, John Fremlin wrote:

> O dear. I'd like to point out once again that the NetBSD kernel is not
> portable to gcc-2.95,

It isn't?  NetBSD/arm26 certainly works happily with 2.95.3, and has
worked with 2.95.2 and egcs-1.1.1 in the past (I've had no cause to test
it lately).  The PR database doesn't appear to mention any problems
building the kernel with 2.95, so if you know of some, please report
them so we can get them fixed.

Ben Harris                                                   <>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26               <URL:>