Subject: Re: kernel_pt_table should be static?
To: Chris Gilbert <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: John Fremlin <email@example.com>
Date: 05/27/2001 13:34:57
Chris Gilbert <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Indeed. Indeed. I'm rewriting initarm now (a spot of much needed work
> > IMHO). Would other ARMs want it? ATM it is just for psionw.
> The thing is that every arm arch has it's own version of initarm,
That is one of the big problems of the ARM ports IMHO. A lot of code
is copied from one another instead of improved and shared. This
copying is often done to add or take out nasty hacks without using
#ifdefs, when the best solution would be not to have the nasty hacks
in the first place ;-)