> And in my fine posting I was asking "why some PRECOMPILED binaries" (from
> uni-regensburg) etc. I thought that they were made by "carefull" people and
> the problem could be solved by changing some elements in my setup. So I asked.

 By proper deduction while reading the mentioned paragraph you would have 
understood that for precompiled binaries you are out of luck.

> Now You indirectly explained to me that I have to look for sources and compile
> them on my own. We could save some network bandwidth if You had dropped out
> the "indirections". The same about rgb.txt... Thanks anyway!

 I never did. Don't slander me. Better learn to ask questions which can be
answered in one step: "Where can I find rgb.txt?" You asked "How can I 
generate (or compile) rgb.txt?" - which is undoubtful a meta-question when
the real question was another. You are behaving like child which got
answers and is not happy about the truth it was told. 

 Concerning my "indirections": How about understanding that they were
purposefully done? Writing you the sources and pointers where to find
the information requested, you have to act yourself to acchieve your goal
and actually learn quite a lot more, ie. about side-effects.

 Telling you "rgb.txt can be find in..." wouldn't have helped you a lot
understanding where the file actually is generated. And then again your
questions wasnt asking about the "where" but the "how to".

-- 
Markus Illenseer