Re: Changes to named between 7.0 and 9.2?

[Brad Spencer <brad%anduin.eldar.org@localhost>]

steve%prd.co.uk@localhost (Steve Blinkhorn) writes:

> I only have NetBSD and Windows 10 machines.  I have tried the nsupdate from all my NetBSD machiness, a mix of: i386-7.0 amd64-7.0 amd64-8.0_RC1
> and amd64_9.2.  It only fails from the 9.2 machines, which suggests to
> me that the server setup is fine, but something is wrong with openssl
> on my 9.2 installations.  In my named.conf file I have:
>         allow-update {key "update";};
> to grant the update permission for testing purposes.
>
> I can well believe that something is wrong with the 9.2 installations
> (therre have been other problems) and that maybe a configurtion file
> needs attention.  But what and where?
>
> --
> Steve Blinkhorn <steve%prd.co.uk@localhost>


I found some time while watching paint dry (pkgsrc builds running) to
install a VirtualBox VM of the 9.2 build from ftp.netbsd.org.

I had no trouble using the 9.2 build against a NetBSD/amd64 8.0_STABLE
with BIND 9.10.5 from an older pkgsrc.  I did have to make sure I used
the IPv4 address of the DNS server on the VirtualBox VM, as the
VirtualBox VM didn't have IPv6 configured, so the nsupdate "server
<hostname>" thing pulled the wrong address and of course, this was all
NAT'ed out my laptop.  But it all worked as expected with nsupdate.




-- 
Brad Spencer - brad%anduin.eldar.org@localhost - KC8VKS - http://anduin.eldar.org