Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu%netbsd.org@localhost> writes: > NetBSD/amd64 XEN3_DOM0 kernel does not include dev/usb/usbdevices.config > as GENERIC does. Is there a reason for that? Any opposition to align > XEN3_DOM0 USB support to GENERIC? heh. A while ago I asked a structurally similar question, about exactly what I don't remember, and in general the answer is that there is no good reason. I started down the path of making XEN3_DOM0 similar and did a lot of rearranging that didn't actually change much, and a few steps of aligning. I dimly remember that there might be reasons to leave something out, but a vague sense that if so it should be commented why. So no, as far as I can tell, no reason other than that before committing it some testing is needed.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature