Port-amd64 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Specification of BTINFO_CONSOLE value in bootinfo.h

To: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>, "tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost" <tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost>, "port-amd64%netbsd.org@localhost" <port-amd64%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Specification of BTINFO_CONSOLE value in bootinfo.h
From: deco33000%yandex.com@localhost
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:02:32 +0200

"which kind of defeats having a high level boot loader in first place"

Not if you plan to have multiple OS on the same hdd. Other than that, I fully agree.

-- 
Jog

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Specification of BTINFO_CONSOLE value in bootinfo.h
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

References:
- Specification of BTINFO_CONSOLE value in bootinfo.h
  - From: deco33000
- Re: Specification of BTINFO_CONSOLE value in bootinfo.h
  - From: John Nemeth
- Re: Specification of BTINFO_CONSOLE value in bootinfo.h
  - From: deco33000
- Re: Specification of BTINFO_CONSOLE value in bootinfo.h
  - From: Sheda
- Re: Specification of BTINFO_CONSOLE value in bootinfo.h
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: Specification of BTINFO_CONSOLE value in bootinfo.h
Next by Date: Re: Specification of BTINFO_CONSOLE value in bootinfo.h
Previous by Thread: Re: Specification of BTINFO_CONSOLE value in bootinfo.h
Next by Thread: Re: Specification of BTINFO_CONSOLE value in bootinfo.h
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index