Port-amd64 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: ipmi testers wanted



(2013/06/28 15:59), YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,

can anyone with ipmi capable systems test the patch in PR/46833?  thanks.

YAMAMOTO Takashi




 Index: ipmi.c
 ===================================================================
 RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/x86/x86/ipmi.c,v
 retrieving revision 1.54
 diff -u -p -r1.54 ipmi.c
 --- ipmi.c     19 Mar 2013 06:34:28 -0000      1.54
 +++ ipmi.c     7 May 2013 10:58:48 -0000
 @@ -146,7 +146,11 @@ int       ipmi_enabled = 0;


  #define IPMI_ENTITY_PWRSUPPLY         0x0A


 -#define IPMI_INVALID_SENSOR           (1L << 5)
 +#define IPMI_SENSOR_SCANNING_ENABLED  (1L << 6)
 +#define IPMI_SENSOR_UNAVAILABLE               (1L << 5)
 +#define IPMI_INVALID_SENSOR_P(x) \
 +      (((x) & (IPMI_SENSOR_SCANNING_ENABLED|IPMI_SENSOR_UNAVAILABLE)) \
 +      == IPMI_SENSOR_SCANNING_ENABLED)

must be

        == IPMI_SENSOR_UNAVAILABLE)

right?





  #define IPMI_SDR_TYPEFULL             1
  #define IPMI_SDR_TYPECOMPACT          2
 @@ -1716,7 +1720,7 @@ read_sensor(struct ipmi_softc *sc, struc
            s1->m, s1->m_tolerance, s1->b, s1->b_accuracy, s1->rbexp, 
s1->linear);
        dbg_printf(10, "values=%.2x %.2x %.2x %.2x %s\n",
            data[0],data[1],data[2],data[3], edata->desc);
 -      if (data[1] & IPMI_INVALID_SENSOR) {
 +      if (IPMI_INVALID_SENSOR_P(data[1])) {
                /* Check if sensor is valid */
                edata->state = ENVSYS_SINVALID;
        } else {




--
-----------------------------------------------
                SAITOH Masanobu (msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost
                                 msaitoh%netbsd.org@localhost)


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index