Re: x86 pcitag_t change proposal/patch

[Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>]

On Dec 5, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:

> Round 2:
> 
> Use more descriptive pcitag_t structure member names and add comment
> updates.
> 
> I did not change the use of bitfields in pcitag_t because they are not
> used with the hardware.
> <pcitag-diff-1.txt>

I still don't like use of bitfields.  in 99% of the cases the tag will be or'ed 
with the register number and bitfields prevent that.