Port-amd64 archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
emulators/suse100_base on NetBSD-5/amd64 broken?
Hi,
I recently started to use amd64 on some new machines, and had problems
with the emulators/suse100_base + suse100_compat packages. The reason
for using these are for our NetBackup client software...
I has worked fine on i386 for years, but now, then using amd64 is
fails...
# uname -a
NetBSD localhost.localdomain 5.0_RC4 NetBSD 5.0_RC4 (GENERIC) #0: Wed
Apr 15 00:11:21 UTC 2009 builds%b6.netbsd.org@localhost:/home/builds/ab/
netbsd-5-0-RC4/amd64/200904142015Z-obj/home/builds/ab/netbsd-5-0-RC4/
src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC amd64
# pkg_info | grep suse
suse_base-10.0nb5 Linux compatibility package
suse_compat-10.0nb3 Linux compatibility package with old shared
libraries
# sysctl emul.linux.kern.osrelease
emul.linux.kern.osrelease: 2.4.18
# chroot /emul/linux /bin/bash
bash-3.00# ls
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
bash-3.00# exit
I spoke with manu%netbsd.org@localhost, who wrote the LINUX_COMPAT/amd64,
and he said that I should use emul.linux.kern.osrelease = 2.6.11 or
later for Linux/amd64 libc to load.
(btw. I can't find that documented either...)
So I gave that a try as well...
# sysctl -w emul.linux.kern.osrelease=2.6.11
emul.linux.kern.osrelease: 2.4.18 -> 2.6.11
# chroot /emul/linux /bin/bash
[1] Segmentation fault (core dumped) chroot /emul/linux /bin/bash
And that seemed to perform even worse...
Anybody else seen this problem?
Can't find a PR describing this, so if no one has any other opinion,
I'll file a PR.
I'm now using emulators/suse100_32_base + suse100_32_compat, which
works fine under amd64.
/P
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index