Re: Mac Pro working with NetBSD 4, but not current

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <20080512131436.9d7c2f10.tnn%NetBSD.org@localhost>,
Tobias Nygren  <tnn%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:
>On Sun, 11 May 2008 07:39:13 +0000 (UTC)
>John Klos <john%ziaspace.com@localhost> wrote:
>
>> Also, I just thought I'd mention that top on an 8 processor system gets a 
>> bit silly:
>> 
>> load averages:  0.00,  0.00,  0.00                  up 0 days,  0:02  
>00:38:12
>> 38 processes:  37 sleeping, 1 on processor
>> CPU0 states:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  0.0% interrupt,  100% 
>> idle
>> CPU1 states:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  0.0% interrupt,  100% 
>> idle
>> CPU2 states:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  0.0% interrupt,  100% 
>> idle
>> CPU3 states:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  0.0% interrupt,  100% 
>> idle
>> CPU4 states:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  0.0% interrupt,  100% 
>> idle
>> CPU5 states:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  0.0% interrupt,  100% 
>> idle
>> CPU6 states:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  0.0% interrupt,  100% 
>> idle
>> CPU7 states:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  0.0% interrupt,  100% 
>> idle
>
>I guess eventually there will be more processors than lines on an 80x24
>terminal. How do people feel about changing the above to something like this?
>
>       user   nice    sys   intr   idle         user   nice    sys   intr   
> idle
>CPU0   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   100%  CPU4   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   
>100%
>CPU1   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   100%  CPU5   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   
>100%
>CPU2   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   100%  CPU6   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   
>100%
>CPU3   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   100%  CPU7   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   
>100%

That's nice, but still it would be good to support the linux cpu summary
toggle ('1').

christos