--19uQFt6ulqmgNgg1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:55:31PM +0100, Juan RP wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:41:32 -0500
> "Jonathan A. Kollasch" <jakllsch@kollasch.net> wrote:
>=20
> > It isn't?  How so?  Or else I'm confusing this with what my Celeron M
> > 350 needs.
>=20
> I don't have numbers to show effectivity. But if you can test it
> with your laptop and checking how many W you save using it, would be
> really nice.

Well, you (and those articles) are right.  There is no (noticeable anyway)
power use difference at idle using ODCM.  However, at full load
it can/does regulate power use (and performance).  I measured the
power using the ACPI battery discharge rate, available with envstat.

	Jonathan Kollasch

--19uQFt6ulqmgNgg1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGAqZYOjx1ye3hmokRAkjTAKCnSvHnNGnJ3RJRsSr29c1CYWPsyQCdEF/Y
YnA2lCJ1b1Ng3zf1QcqyIBc=
=hWVe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--19uQFt6ulqmgNgg1--