Subject: Re: Xorg doesn't compile
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Michael-John Turner <email@example.com>
Date: 03/12/2006 11:52:32
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 11:37:14PM -0700, Rick Kelly wrote:
> There are basically two makers of video chips these days, nvidia and ati,
> and modern cards don't seem to be supported by X anymore.
Looking at radeon(4) under "supported hardware" on a 3.0 system:
RV280 Radeon 9200PRO/9200/9200SE, M9+
What does your XFree86.0.log show? I'm running 1600x1200 on a horrible ATI
Rage Pro (the onboard video on a Sun Ultra 5/10), previously with 3.0_BETA
and now with -current.
How is your XF86Config setup? Are the frequencies for your monitor defined
correctly? If XFree86 _thinks_ your monitor can't handle 1280x1024, it
won't make the resolution available. You'll see lines like:
(II) ATI(0): Not using default mode "1024x768" (hsync out of range)
The Radeon 9200 is sufficiently old that it should be well supported by
XFree86, not requiring a move to X.org.
Michael-John Turner | http://weblogs.turner.org.za/mj/
firstname.lastname@example.org | Open Source in WC ZA - http://www.clug.org.za/