Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Chris Kantarjiev wrote:
> 
>>Oh. That's tlp0, not tlc0, for anyone that's really paying attention.
>>
>>I ended up, for now at least, installing the 2.1-RC3 sets. Didn't really 
>>work very well, but I got a kernel that seems to support the skc/sk 
>>DGE-530T (Marvell 88E1011 chipset), at least to the point where it will 
>>light up the link LED on the hub, even if it doesn't light up its own 
>>LEDs in any way. Very odd behaviour there - I think I'll try another card...
>>
>>But the file system isn't really quite right; no big surprise, I guess, 
>>since I used the 3.0 floppies. Would really like to find the correct 
>>sets to install...
> 
> 
> I'd expect a new 3.0_BETA sets would appear in pub/NetBSD-daily in a few days.
> That's a problem with the current autobuild scripts: for branches, it will
> keep only one instance of the build. So if the build goes bad, you end
> up with no binary sets for the branch on the ftp server :(
> 
OK, I'll try to be patient. I tried the 2.1-RC3 'daily' last night and 
had a lot of network problems. I really don't want to drop back to 2.0.2 
if I can avoid it ... works, but crashes every other day in our usage.