On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:44:49PM +0200, Klaus Klein wrote:
> The reason for this is that at the time those releases were cut the
> set list for the install image was missing the ffsv2 boot code.
> This has been fixed since but wasn't requested to be pulled up
> to the release branches.  I've just done so; in the meantime,
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2005/01/17/0031.html
> to your sources in case you want to build them.

Thanks :)

Does this mean that the iso's on the ftp server will be updated? or do I
have to build my own sets/iso?

> That change notwithstanding you might want to reconsider whether
> FFSv2 is actually necessary.

What do you mean ? My system doesn't boot amd64 no matter what ffs
version(1 or 2) I choose.

-- 
Regards.,
 Tim