Subject: Re: intlock
To: Frank van der Linden <email@example.com>
From: Simon Burge <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/29/2004 18:04:16
[ Catching up on mail ]
Frank van der Linden wrote:
> Then again, for MP system with ioapics, the chance of shared interrupts
> is a lot smaller.
I've got a dual xeon here what has a couple of devices on irq 11:
auich0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 17 (irq 11)
ehci0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 23 (irq 11)
uhci0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 16 (irq 11)
wm0: interrupting at ioapic2 pin 6 (irq 11)
Should these have been put on separate irqs then?
All these are on-board devices.
Simon Burge <email@example.com>
NetBSD Support and Service: http://www.wasabisystems.com/