[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: libm tests vs. alpha
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:28:33PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> Do I understand this correctly?
I did not - I missed at least fp_c and the software fp completition stuff.
And most importantly: fp_c has exception enable bits (which we clear in
setregs) instead of the optional hardware trap *D disable bits (which
we update from fp_c if needed).
And I also did not really understand the trap mode modifiers and the compiler
switches controlling their generation.
But there is more fallout - I'll dig deeper.
Main Index |
Thread Index |